今天是:   返回主页   |   加入收藏   |   联系我们
引用本文:
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器  关闭
附件
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1375次   下载 1595 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
国内中西医研究亚健康状态诊断标准文献计量学分析
李戈, 王泓午
天津中医药大学中医学院, 天津 300193
摘要:
[目的] 了解中国亚健康状态文献中关于亚健康的诊断标准采用情况。[方法] 采用计量学方法对中国1984年1月-2009年10月正式发表的1 308篇亚健康状态研究文献进行了统计, 分析不同学科、不同研究类型的文献是否采用诊断标准存在差别。[结果] 国内亚健康标准众多, 以自编量表为主, 不同学科类别、不同研究类型的文献对量表的选择趋向亦不同。[结论] 目前国内亚健康研究应在统一和规范亚健康诊断标准上加大工作力度。
关键词:  亚健康  诊断标准  文献分析
DOI:10.11656/j.issn.1672-1519.2012.05.27
分类号:
基金项目:科技部“十一五”科技支撑计划(2006BAI13B05).
Quantitative analysis on research documents of medicine about sub-health
LI Ge, WANG Hong-wu
College of TCM, Tianjin University of TCM, Tianjin 300193, China
Abstract:
[Objective] To understand the general conditions of the research documents in medicine about sub-health on its diagnostic criteria. [Methods] The 1 308 research documents about sub-health were analyzed by statistical methods from 1984 to 2009. [Results] The literature volume which had a diagnostic criteria had accounted for 33.87%. Different categories, type literature on whether to adopt diagnostic criteria was different. There were many sub-health standards in our country, and most of them were self-designed. Different categories, type literature tend to different choice. [Conclusion] It is necessary to unify diagnostic criteria on sub-health.
Key words:  sub-health  diagnostic criteria  documents analysis
关注公众号二维码