理学之风视角下的刘完素与朱震亨火热论异同之探微

From the perspective of Neo-Confucianism LIU Wansu and ZHU Zhenheng's fiery theory of similarities and differences

关键词:  理学  刘完素  朱震亨  火热理论

Key words:  Neo-Confucianism  LIU Wansu  ZHU Zhenheng  fiery theory

摘要:

刘完素和朱震亨生活在理学兴盛的年代，学术思想的形成与理学颇有渊源。文章通过对比分析的方法，研究理学因素对刘完素、朱震亨两位医家火热理论的影响，发现因对天人相应、太极学说等共性理论理解的不同，以及刘完素对理学中“火”之特性和朱震亨对“存天理灭人欲”等个性思想的采纳，使二人对于火热理解的差异愈发明显。归根到底在于刘完素认为外感六气皆能化火，朱震亨提出体内相火失约而为害，最终形成刘完素主张外感之实火，朱震亨推崇内生之虚火的学术氛围。探明理学对刘完素、朱震亨二人“火”理论的影响，有助于从哲学角度完善火热理论的内涵。

Abstract:

LIU Wansu and ZHU Zhenheng lived in the epoch of the prosperity of Neo-Confucianism. The formation of their academic ideology has a lot of sources with Neo-Confucianism. By using the way which is comparative analysis,this dissertation discusses the influence of Neo-Confucianism factors on LIU Wansu's and ZHU Zhenheng's fiery theory. It is found that on account of the differences in their understanding of the common theories such as the unity of The sky and man and the theory of Tai Chi,as well as the personality contents such as LIU Wansu's adoption of the characteristics of "fire" with Neo-Confucianism and ZHU Zhenheng's adoption of thoughts such as "saving heaven and eliminating human desires",their different understanding of fiery theory becomes gradually obvious.In the final analysis,LIU Wansu believes that the six climatic of external sensation can turn into fire. ZHU Zhenheng puts forward that the internal phase loses restriction will does harm,which finally forms an academic atmosphere in which LIU Wansu advocates the real fire of external sensation and ZHU Zhenheng advocates the endogenous virtual fire. Exploring the influence of Neo-Confucianism on LIU Wansu and ZHU Zhenheng's "fire" theory will help to improve the connotation of fire theory from a philosophical viewpoint.