| 摘要: |
| [目的] 评估中国老年医学领域系统评价或者Meta分析的方法学与报告质量，为规范中国老年医学领域同类循证研究提供根据与借鉴。[方法] 由两位研究者独立检索中国知网（CNKI）、维普中文期刊数据库（VIP）、万方数据库（WanFang）和中国生物医学文献数据库（CBM）数据库自建库至2016年5月所发表的中国老年医学系统评价或者Meta分析文献，利用AMSTAR量表和PRISMA量表对最终纳入文献进行评价。[结果] 纳入的193篇文献中，65篇为系统评价，128篇为Meta分析。方法学与报告质量的问题主要表现为检索不全面，偏倚风险评估未得到相应重视，研究中的资助来源未详细说明等。[结论] 中国老年医学系统评价或者Meta分析的文献数量较多，但质量还有待提高。建议老年医学研究者能够提升循证研究能力，严格遵照规范报告格式撰写文献。 |
| 关键词: 老年 系统评价 Meta分析 质量评价 |
| DOI：10.11656/j.issn.1672-1519.2016.12.06 |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:国家中医药管理局国家中医临床研究基地业务建设科研专项基金项目（JDZX2012145）。 |
|
| Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses in geriatrics in China |
|
ZHAO Ying, LIU Jian
|
|
Acupuncture Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, China
|
| Abstract: |
| [Objective] To evaluate reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses.[Methods] CNKI,VIP,Wanfang,CBM data base were searched for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in geriatrics in China from the establishment date to May 2016.PRISMA and AMSTAR checklists were used to assess.[Results] A total of 193 systematic reviews and Meta-analyses involving 65 systematic reviews and 128 Meta-analyses were identified.The quantity and quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses published on Chinese journal of geriatrics are increased and improved in recent years.The deficiencies of reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses mainly contained literature search,assessment of publication bias and publication funds.[Conclusion] The reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses in geriatrics rises gradually over years in China,but it still needs to be further improved.The elder medical researchers need to promote evidence-based research capacity and strictly follow the standard format of report to write literature. |
| Key words: geriatrics systems analysis Meta-analyses quality assessment |
