基于文献分析和德尔菲法的《痰湿质干预效果评价量表》条目筛选研究

Development items research for “phlegm-dampness constitution intervention effect evaluation scale（PDC-IES）” based on literature research and Delphi method

关键词:  中医体质  痰湿质  效果评价  量表  德尔菲法

Key words:  traditional Chinese medicine constitution  phlegm-dampness constitution  intervention effect evaluation  scale  Delphi method

摘要:

[目的] 初步筛选并确定痰湿质干预效果评价量表的条目。[方法] 基于文献研究分析，构建痰湿质干预效果评价量表条目池，根据条目出现的频数、小组讨论及临床经验，确定初步条目并形成专家咨询问卷；采用德尔菲法，遴选19名相关研究且经验丰富的专家进行专家咨询，统计学分析并筛选条目。[结果] 两轮咨询专家积极系数均为100%，专家权威系数（Cr）为0.935。经过第1轮专家咨询，11项条目修改1项，增加1项，共12项条目进行第2轮咨询；经过第2轮专家咨询，12项条目均值（MV）＞3.5，满分比（FSR）＞0.2。[结论] 联合应用文献调研与德尔菲法筛选出痰湿质干预效果评价量表条目12项，均具有良好的代表性与可靠性，可作为评价痰湿质干预效果的条目。

Abstract:

[Objective] To select and determine the items of the “phlegm-dampness constitution intervention effect evaluation scale（PDC-IES）”. [Methods] Based on literature research and analysis，a pool of items was constructed for PDC-IES. Initial items were determined according to the frequency of items，group discussion，and clinical experience，and an expert survey questionnaire was formed. Base on Delphi method，19 relevant and experienceed experts were selected for expert survey，and statistical analysis was conducted to sclect the items. [Results] The expert positivity coefficient and authority coefficient in 2 round survey were 100% and 0.935. After the first round of expert survey，one item among the 11 items was modified，and one item was added，and 12 items for the second roundsurvey. After the second round，the mean value（MV）>3.5 and the full score ratio（FSR）>0.2 of the 12 items. [Conclusion] The 12 items for PDC-IES were selected base on literature research and Delphi method，all of which have well representativeness and reliability，and can be used as items for evaluating the intervention effect of phlegm-damp.