今天是:   返回主页   |   加入收藏   |   联系我们
引用本文:
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器  关闭
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1899次   下载 2660 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
中医药临床研究两组疗效对比数据不同处理方法解读
李戈1, 杨宇2, 商洪才1
1.天津中医药大学, 天津 300193;2.天津市和平区白楼医院, 天津 300040
摘要:
[目的] 解析中医药临床研究中两组疗效对比数据的不同处理方法。[方法] 以四联疗法治疗肾虚血瘀型膝关节骨性关节病(KOA)的数据分析为例,将采集到的两组62例肾虚血瘀型KOA患者5个时间点数据,分别进行了基线分析、纵向计量指标的疗效分析及等级分类指标的疗效分析,比较采取不同处理方法可能产生的不同效果。[结果] 采取不同的统计方法,统计结果不尽相同。[结论] 根据研究设计及数据结构与特征,并结合中医临床研究的专业性需求,选择适宜的统计分析策略,以期为中医临床研究提供最佳技术支持,也是中医临床研究和统计学共同发展的需要。
关键词:  中医  临床疗效  统计分析
DOI:10.11656/j.issn.1673-9043.2014.02.04
分类号:
基金项目:天津市和平区卫生局医药卫生基金项目(09KG001)。
The strategy of statistic analysis in clinical efficacy comparison between two treatments
LI Ge1, YANG Yu2, SHANG Hong-cai1
1.Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, China;2.Bailou Hospital of Heping District, Tianjin 300040, China
Abstract:
[Objective] To discuss the strategy of statistic analysis in clinical efficacy comparison between two treatments in clinical research of traditional Chinese medicine. [Methods] For KOA with renal weak and silky blood cases, the data include 62 patients who are divided into two groups in random and were observed at five time points. To explore and compare different statistic procedures and results, the data was analyzed in baseline and efficacy in different ways. [Results] Different statistic strategy of statistic analysis would lead to different results. [Conclusion] To support in clinical research of traditional Chinese medicine, try to process data in different ways according to different designs, different data types, different features and professional requires, which is needed by the developments of Chinese medicine and statistics.
Key words:  traditional Chinese medicine  clinical efficacy  statistic analysis
关注公众号二维码