今天是:   返回主页   |   加入收藏   |   联系我们
引用本文:
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器  关闭
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 51次   下载 8 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
技术标准适用性评价方法及中医领域应用分析
袁馨如1,2, 郭扬1,2, 吕笑颜1,2, 郭义1,2,3,4, 赵雪1,2,3,4, 李丹1,2,3, 陈泽林1,2,3, 邱继文5, 陈波1,2,3,4
1.天津中医药大学中医药标准化研究所, 天津 301617;2.天津中医药大学针灸推拿学院, 天津 301617;3.国家中医针灸临床研究中心, 天津 300193;4.天津市现代中医理论创新转化重点实验室, 天津 301617;5.天津中医药大学医学技术学院, 天津 301617
摘要:
[目的] 梳理分析现有技术标准适用性评价方法及其在中医领域的应用,并针对现有问题提出相应建议。[方法] 计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据知识服务平台数据库(WanFang Data)和维普中文期刊服务平台(VIP)数据库,搜集与技术标准适用性评价相关的文献,检索时限均为建库至2024年3月。对筛选出的文献进行数据分析,总结归纳纳入文献的基本特征。[结果] 共纳入7篇技术标准适用性评价方法文献和31篇中医技术标准适用性评价文献。研究发现,不同适用性评价方法对评价维度侧重各异,且在构建评价指标体系及开发评价工具过程中常用德尔菲法。目前中医技术标准适用性评价研究采用的方法及工具较单一,但中医技术标准适用性总体评价结果良好。[结论] 技术标准适用性评价指标体系构建及评价方法的选择、不同类型标准适用性评价工具的开发以及中医技术标准适用性提高等方面仍有待完善,未来的研究应当着重于这些领域的深入研究和改进。
关键词:  技术标准  适用性  评价  中医
DOI:10.11656/j.issn.1673-9043.2025.03.09
分类号:R2-03
基金项目:国家中医药管理局政府购买服务(中医药标准化项目)(GZY-FJS-2023-013)。
Analysis of applicability evaluation methods for technical standards and their Application in traditional Chinese Medicine field
YUAN Xinru1,2, GUO Yang1,2, LYU Xiaoyan1,2, GUO Yi1,2,3,4, ZHAO Xue1,2,3,4, LI Dan1,2,3, CHEN Zelin1,2,3, QIU Jiwen5, CHEN Bo1,2,3,4
1.Institute of Standardization of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China;2.School of Acupuncture Moxibustion and Tuina, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China;3.National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tianjin 300193, China;4.Tianjin Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine Theory of Innovation and Application, Tianjin 301617, China;5.Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China
Abstract:
[Objective] To analyze existing methods for evaluating the applicability of technical standards and their application in the field of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM),and to propose corresponding suggestions for current issues. [Methods] A computer-assisted literature search was conducted on PubMed,Embase,Web of Science,CNKI,WanFang Data,and VIP databases for documents related to the evaluation of technical standard applicability. The search timeframe was set from the inception of each database to March 2024. Data analysis was performed on the selected documents to summarize and deduce the basic characteristics of the included literature. [Results] A total of 7 documents on the evaluation methods for technical standard applicability and 31 documents on the applicability evaluation of TCM technical standards were included. It was found that different applicability evaluation methods emphasize various aspects of the evaluation dimensions,and the Delphi method is commonly used in the construction of evaluation indicator systems and the development of evaluation tools. Currently,the methods and tools used for the applicability evaluation of TCM technical standards are relatively singular,but the overall evaluation results of the applicability of TCM technical standards are generally good. [Conclusion] There is still room for improvement in the construction of technical standard applicability evaluation indicator systems,the selection of evaluation methods,the development of evaluation tools for different types of standards,and the enhancement of the applicability of TCM technical standards. Future research should focus on in-depth research and improvement in these areas.
Key words:  technical standard  applicability  evaluation  traditional Chinese medicine
关注公众号二维码