| 本文已被:浏览 144次 下载 80次 |
 码上扫一扫! |
|
|
| 电针改善重症监护病房患者谵妄状态临床观察 |
|
缪长宏1,2, 许欣宜1,2, 肖璐1, 孔令宜1, 陈匡1
|
|
1.天津中医药大学第一附属医院, 中医国家临床医学研究中心, 天津 300381;2.天津中医药大学研究生院, 天津 301617
|
|
| 摘要: |
| [目的] 研究旨在评估电针对重症监护病房(ICU)患者谵妄状态改善的疗效,特别是其对谵妄持续时间、严重程度以及减少镇静药物使用方面的影响。[方法] 研究为前瞻性、单中心随机对照试验,共纳入76例ICU患者。患者随机分为电针组38例和对照组38例。电针组接受疏密波刺激,频率为2/100 Hz的电针(双侧足三里穴、百会穴)治疗30 min,并接受右美托咪定镇静治疗,每日1次,疗程为7 d。对照组接受常规西医治疗及右美托咪定镇静治疗。研究的主要终点为治疗后谵妄评定量表修订版-98(DRS-R-98)评分变化,次要终点包括右美托咪定使用量、谵妄持续时间、急性生理与慢性健康评分(APACHE Ⅱ评分)及ICU停留时间。[结果] 重复测量方差分析结果示,组别因素方面,提示对照组和电针组在改善DRS-R-98评分方面比较,差异存在统计学意义(P<0.001);时间因素方面,提示对照组和电针组DRS-R-98评分在入组后不同时间点比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。随着时间延长,DRS-R-98评分逐渐降低;组别与时间的交互因素提示组别与时间对DRS-R-98评分变化存在交互作用(P<0.001)。且电针组右美托咪定使用量较对照组显著减少(P<0.05)。电针组谵妄持续时间明显短于对照组(P<0.05)。此外,电针组APACHE Ⅱ评分显著改善(P<0.05),但ICU停留时间两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论] 电针治疗可以显著改善ICU患者的谵妄症状,缩短谵妄持续时间,减少镇静药物使用量,并改善患者的全身状况。电针作为一种安全、有效的辅助治疗手段,具有较大的临床应用潜力,可以为ICU患者的谵妄管理提供新的非药物治疗选择。 |
| 关键词: 电针 谵妄 重症监护病房 右美托咪定 谵妄评定量表修订版-98评分 |
| DOI:10.11656/j.issn.1673-9043.2026.01.03 |
| 分类号:R246.6 |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(82405123);天津中医药大学研究生科研创新项目(YJSKC-20232007);天津市教委重点项目(2022ZD046)。 |
|
| Clinical observation of electroacupuncture in improving delirium in intensive care unit patients |
|
MIAO Changhong1,2, XU Xinyi1,2, XIAO Lu1, KONG Lingyi1, CHEN Kuang1
|
|
1.First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300381, China;2.Graduate School, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China
|
| Abstract: |
| [Objective] To evaluate the efficacy of electroacupuncture in improving delirium in intensive care unit(ICU) patients,particularly regarding its impact on delirium duration,severity,and reduction of sedative use. [Methods] This prospective,single-center randomized controlled trial enrolled 76 ICU patients. They were randomly assigned to an electroacupuncture group(n=38) and a control group(n=38). The electroacupuncture group received 30-minute electroacupuncture treatment with sparse-dense waves at 2/100 Hz [applied bilaterally at Zusanli(ST36) and Baihui(GV20) acupoints] once daily for 7 days,along with sedation using dexmedetomidine. The control group received conventional Western medical treatment and dexmedetomidine sedation. The primary endpoint was the change in the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98(DRS-R-98) score. Secondary endpoints included dexmedetomidine dosage,delirium duration,Acute Physiology and Chronic Health EvaluationⅡ(APACHE Ⅱ) score,and ICU length of stay. [Results] Repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed a statistically significant difference between the two groups in improving DRS-R-98 scores(group effect,P<0.001). DRS-R-98 scores significantly differed across time points after enrollment(time effect,P<0.001),showing a gradual decrease over time. A significant interaction between group and time on DRS-R-98 score changes was observed(P<0.001). The electroacupuncture group used significantly less dexmedetomidine than the control group(P<0.05). Delirium duration was significantly shorter in the electroacupuncture group(P<0.05). The APACHE Ⅱ score improved significantly in the electroacupuncture group(P<0.05),but no significant difference was found in ICU length of stay between the two groups(P>0.05). [Conclusion] Electroacupuncture can significantly improve delirium symptoms,shorten delirium duration,reduce sedative drug dosage,and improve the overall condition of ICU patients. As a safe and effective adjunctive therapy,electroacupuncture holds substantial clinical potential and offers a new non-pharmacological option for managing delirium in ICU patients. |
| Key words: electroacupuncture delirium intensive care unit dexmedetomidine Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 score |